and Dialectical Materialism
1 There's fallacy in Fibonacci if zero is not mentioned.
1 It may mean aught to some, but without it
2 one can't be added to nothing. Which is the point.
Is this a flaw? Or a simple statement of something
3 when absence of nowt essentially ends or fails
to begin a sequence. Marx, (Karl, not the Brothers)
stood on Hegel's shoulders to see a perfect future
5 that obliterated and absolved current inequalities.
But to achieve this social nirvana, an opiate for people
needed to be found. So there's the revolution phase
counter to Georg Wilhelm Friedrich's theory:
every thesis has an antithesis,
8 so the synthesis
becomes a new
starting point.
It cannot stop
at nothing.
Which is where
Leonardo
started.
